Parallel Session I

Tuesday 18 August 2009, 15.00h–18.00h


Room 15A-02, chair: Martijn Boot (Erasmus University, Rotterdam)


15.00h–15.45h : Boaz Miller (University of Toronto), ‘When Is Deferral to Consensus Justified?’
15.45h–16.30h : Sean C. Ebels Duggan (Northwestern University), ‘Epistemic Impermissivism’
16.30h–17.15h : S. Mathew Liao (Oxford University), ‘Epistemic Disagreement’
17.15h–18.00h : Tim Kenyon (University of Waterloo), ‘Biased Believing: Can We Do Better?’

Room 14A-05, chair: Herman Philipse (Utrecht University)


15.00h–15.45h: Laura Cozma (Paris XII University), ‘Is an Ethics of Knowledge a Relevant Alternative to the Ethics of Belief?’
15.45h–16.30h: Anne Meylan (University of Geneva), ‘Theoretical Control and Doxastic Responsibility’
16.30h–17.15h: Miriam McCormick (Richmond University), ‘The Limits of Evidentialism: The Practical Purpose of Belief’
17.15h–18.00h: Jane Friedman (Oxford University), ‘Evidence, Doxastic Attitudes, Favouring’

Room 13A-11/13, chair: Nikolaj Nottelman (U. of Southern Denmark)


15.00h–15.45h: Mikkel Gerken (University of Copenhagen), ‘Warrant by Testimony in Contexts of Disagreement and Diversity’
15.45h–16.30h: Emma Gordon (University of Edinburgh), ‘Disagreement in the Epistemology of Testimony’
16.30h–17.15h: Ben McMyler (Texas A&M University), ‘Responsibility for Testimonial Belief’
17.15h–18.00h: Trent Dougherty (Baylor University), ‘Dealing with Disagreement from the First Person Perspective’